Pace vs Cyclop One

Choosing between Pace and Cyclop One?

Cyclop One runs in the cloud, and it's open source under a MIT license. It calls itself "Autonomous macOS desktop agent powered by Claude vision.".

Where Pace differs: Pace runs its default reasoning and vision stack on-device; Cyclop One requires the Claude API but has a more explicit plugin and remote-control architecture.

The full breakdown is below — what Cyclop One is genuinely good at, its stack, and the honest line on where Pace diverges, including where Pace is behind. For the whole field in one place, see every macOS voice agent compared.

Cyclop One

github.com/cyclop-one/cyclop-one

Autonomous macOS desktop agent powered by Claude vision. — cyclop-one

STT · Local speech recognition Reasoner · Claude API multimodal vision TTS · Not documented Screen · yes

What it's good at

  • ScreenCaptureKit observation with desktop clicking, typing, dragging, scrolling, and keyboard actions.
  • Markdown skills and a JSON-over-stdio plugin protocol.
  • Persistent procedural memory plus remote-control integrations.

Where Pace differs

Pace runs its default reasoning and vision stack on-device; Cyclop One requires the Claude API but has a more explicit plugin and remote-control architecture.

Rechecked July 2026.
If Cyclop One shipped something I missed or got cheaper since, email me and I'll update this page.

Pace is $29 once, fully on-device, and free to try on Apple Intelligence.

Get Pace

← Back to the full comparison